Ultrasound and ultraviolet: crypsis in gliding mammals

PeerJ. 2024 Mar 25:12:e17048. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17048. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Gliding is only present in six extant groups of mammals-interestingly, despite divergent evolutionary histories, all mammalian gliders are strictly nocturnal. Gliding mammals also seem to have relatively high rates of ultrasound use and ultraviolet-induced photoluminescence (UVP) in contrast with their close relatives. Therefore, we hypothesized that, despite diverging lineages, gliding mammals use similar modes of cryptic communication compared to their non-gliding counterparts. We developed two datasets containing the vocal range (minimum-maximum of the dominant harmonic; kHz) and UVP of 73 and 82 species, respectively; we report four novel vocal repertoires and 57 novel observations of the presence or absence of UVP. We complemented these datasets with information about body size, diel activity patterns, habitat openness, and sociality to explore possible covariates related to vocal production and UVP. We found that the maximum of the dominant harmonic was significant higher in gliding mammals when vocalizing than their non-gliding relatives. Additionally, we found that nocturnality was the only significant predictor of UVP, consistent with the previous hypothesis that luminophores primarily drive UVP in mammal fur. In contrast, however, we did not find UVP ubiquitous in nocturnal mammals, suggesting that some unknown process may contribute to variation in this trait.

Keywords: Mammalian phylogeny; Nocturnal; Photoluminescence; Vocal range; Vocal repertoire.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biological Evolution
  • Ecosystem
  • Mammals*
  • Sports*

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.3n5tb2rp4

Grants and funding

This research was funded through an NSERC Discovery Grant to Jeff Bowman and Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarships in Science and Technology awarded to Sasha L. Newar and Bryan Hughes. Additional support was provided by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Trent University, and Laurentian University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.