Introduction: The robotic-assisted (RATS) lobectomy learning curve is usually measured compared to an established videothoracoscopic (VATS) surgery program. The objective of our study is to compare the learning curves of both techniques. Methods: We performed an intention-to-treat analysis comparing the RATS vs. VATS lobectomies. Surgical time, conversions, complications, number of lymph nodes (LNs) and lymph node stations harvested, chest drainage duration, length of stay, readmissions, and 90-day mortality were compared between both groups. The learning curve was assessed using the CUSUM method. Results: RATS cases (30) and VATS cases (35) displayed no significant differences. The RATS learning curve was completed after 23 procedures while the VATS curve required 28 interventions. Complications appeared in four RATS procedures and in eight VATS patients. No differences in the number of LNs and harvested LN stations were reported. Four patients were readmitted in the RATS group, and eight in the VATS group. No 90-day postoperative mortality was observed in either group. The RATS group reported fewer chest tube days (3 (2-5) vs. 5 (4-5.8), p = 0.005) and hospital days (4 (3-6) vs. 5 (4-6), p = 0.023). Conclusions: The RATS curve appears shorter than the VATS curve. RATS lobectomies resulted in reduced chest tube duration and length of stay during the learning time period.
Keywords: learning curve; lobectomy; lung cancer; minimally invasive thoracic surgery (MITS); robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS); surgical techniques; video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).