Can surgeons accurately identify mesh type when interpreting computed tomography scans after ventral hernia repair?

N Messer; M S Melland; B T Miller; D M Krpata; L R A Beffa; T Chao; C C Petro; S M Maskal; R C Ellis; M J Rosen; A S Prabhu

doi:10.1007/s10029-024-03024-w

Can surgeons accurately identify mesh type when interpreting computed tomography scans after ventral hernia repair?

Hernia. 2024 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03024-w. Online ahead of print.

Authors

N Messer^{1

2}, M S Melland³, B T Miller³, D M Krpata³, L R A Beffa³, T Chao⁴, C C Petro³, S M Maskal³, R C Ellis³, M J Rosen³, A S Prabhu³

Affiliations

¹ Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA. masrinir@gmail.com.
² Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. masrinir@gmail.com.
³ Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
⁴ Department of Statistics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

PMID: 38538811
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03024-w

Abstract

Background: Recurrent ventral hernia repair can be challenging due to scarred tissue planes and the increasing complexity of disease related to multiple recurrences. Given the challenges of acquiring complete and accurate prior operative reports, surgeons often rely on computed tomography (CT) scans to obtain information and plan for re-operation. Still, the contribution of CT scans and the ability of surgeons to interpret them is controversial. Previously, we examined the ability of surgeons to determine prior operative techniques based on CT scans. Here, we assessed the accuracy of expert abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) surgeons in identifying the type of prior mesh using CT imaging.

Methods: A total of 22 highly experienced AWR surgeons were asked to evaluate 21 CT scans of patients who had undergone open ventral hernia repair with bilateral transversus abdominis release utilizing mesh. The surgeons were required to identify the mesh type from a multiple-choice selection. Additionally, negative controls (patients without a history of prior laparotomy) and positive controls (patients with laparotomy but no ventral hernia repair) were incorporated. The accuracy of the surgeons and interrater reliability was calculated.

Results: The accuracy rate of the surgeons in correctly identifying the mesh type was 46%, with heavy-weight synthetic mesh (HWSM) being identified only 35.4% of the time, Strattice mesh and medium-weight synthetic mesh (MWSM) were identified at 46.3%, and 51.8%, respectively. The interrater reliability analysis found a moderate level of agreement 0.428 (95% CI 0.356-0.503), and the repeatability measure was poor-0.053 (95% CI 0-0.119); this indicates that surgeons cannot reliably replicate the identification process.

Conclusions: Surgeons' ability to accurately identify the type of previous mesh using CT scans is poor. This study underscores the importance of documenting the type of mesh used in the operative report and the need for standardized operative notes to improve the accuracy and consistency of documentation.

Keywords: Accuracy; Computed tomography (CT); Interpretation; Interrater reliability; Mesh type; Reoperation; Ventral hernia repair.