Inter- and intra-rater reliability of knee flexion angle measurements on X-ray and MRI

Harry Kyle Campbell Summers; Stephen Picken; Oday Al-Dadah

doi:10.21037/aoj-22-2

Inter- and intra-rater reliability of knee flexion angle measurements on X-ray and MRI

Ann Jt. 2022 Oct 15:7:34. doi: 10.21037/aoj-22-2. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Harry Kyle Campbell Summers¹, Stephen Picken¹, Oday Al-Dadah^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, South Tyneside District Hospital, South Shields, UK.
² Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

Abstract

Background: Range of motion (ROM) is an important aspect of orthopaedic patient assessment. It can be measured at the knee joint by determining the knee flexion angle (KFA) a patient can achieve at extremes of flexion and extension. As with any measurement, the accuracy and reliability of the method used determine its validity. The consistency of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans as compared to the current gold standard of X-ray remains unknown in terms of KFA evaluation. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the reliability of measuring KFA between X-ray and MRI scans.

Methods: This study included 80 patients (94 knees) who had attended a specialist knee clinic due to varying knee pathologies and undergone both X-ray and MRI scans. Lateral and T1-weighted sagittal imaging views (respectively) were used to measure KFA by two trained observers independently at two separate time points, 8 weeks apart. The data was then statistically analysed and intra- and inter-observer reliability calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: The intra-observer reliability for X-ray was 0.96 (P<0.001) and that for MRI was 0.83 (P<0.001). The inter-observer reliability for X-ray was 0.99 (P<0.001) and that for MRI was 0.81 (P<0.001). All the intra-class correlation coefficients were graded as excellent in both the intra- and inter-observer reliability analysis. Overall, the mean KFA was notably higher on X-ray measurements than that on MRI scans. There was a statistically significant difference between Time 1 and Time 2 measurements (17.7° vs. 16.8°) for MRI data (P=0.022). No significant difference was found for X-ray measurements (46.4° vs. 45.6°) in this regard (P=0.182).

Conclusions: Both X-ray and MRI allow KFA to be measured with an excellent degree of reliability. However, X-ray measurements were overall superior to that of MRI mainly due to the larger field of view of the visible on-screen image which more readily identifies the anatomical landmarks required to measure KFA.

Keywords: Knee; X-ray; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); range of motion; reliability.