Objective: To compare substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of a hydrogel-based, matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (M-ACI) method versus microfracture (MFx) in the treatment of knee cartilage defects.
Design: Propensity score matched-pair analysis, using the MFx control group of a phase III study as comparator for M-ACI treatment in a single-arm phase III study, resulting in 144 patients in the matched-pair set.
Results: Groups were comparable regarding baseline Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), sex, age, body mass index, symptom duration, smoking status, and previous knee surgeries. Defect sizes in the M-ACI group were significantly larger than in the MFx group (6.4 cm2 vs. 3.7 cm2). Other differences concerned location, number, and etiology of defects that were not considered to influence the interpretation of results. At 24 months, significantly more patients in the M-ACI group achieved SCB in KOOS pain (72.2% vs. 48.6%; P = 0.0108), symptoms (84.7% vs. 61.1%, P = 0.0039), sports/recreation (84.7% vs. 56.9%, P = 0.0008), and quality of life (QoL; 72.2% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.0014). The SCBs for KOOS activities in daily living and International Knee Documentation Committee score were higher for M-ACI but not significantly different from MFx. The SCB rates consistently favored M-ACI from 3 months onward. The highest improvements from baseline at 24 months in patients with SCB were observed for KOOS sports/rec. (M-ACI: 60.8 points, MFx: 55.9 points) and QoL (M-ACI: 58.1, MFx: 57.4).
Conclusion: Hydrogel-based M-ACI demonstrated superior SCB in KOOS pain, symptoms, sports/rec., and QoL compared with MFx in patients with knee cartilage defects through 2 years follow-up.
Keywords: autologous chondrocyte implantation; cartilage repair; hydrogel; knee; substantial clinical benefit.