The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):2063-2070. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07417-1. Epub 2024 Mar 18.

Abstract

Purpose: The surgical technique for uterine closure following cesarean section influences the healing of the cesarean scar; however, there is still no consensus on the optimal technique regarding the closure of the endometrium layer. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of closure versus non-closure of the endometrium during cesarean section on the risk to develop uterine scar defect and associated symptoms.

Methods: A randomized prospective study was conducted of women undergoing first elective cesarean section at a single tertiary medical center. Exclusion criteria included previous uterine scar, preterm delivery and dysmorphic uterus. Women were randomized for endometrial layer closure versus non-closure. Six months following surgery, women were invited to the ambulatory gynecological clinic for follow-up visit. 2-D transvaginal ultrasound examination was performed to evaluate the cesarean scar characteristics. In addition, women were evaluated for symptoms that might be associated with uterine scar defect. Primary outcome was defined as the residual myometrial thickness (RMT) at the uterine cesarean scar. Data are presented as median and interquartile range.

Results: 130 women were recruited to the study, of them follow-up was achieved in 113 (86.9%). 61 (54%) vs. 52 (46%) of the women were included in the endometrial closure vs. non-closure groups, respectively. Groups were comparable for patient's demographic, clinical characteristics and follow-up time for postoperative evaluation. Median RMT was 5.3 (3.0-7.7) vs. 4.6 (3.0-6.5) mm for the endometrial closure and non-closure groups, respectively (p = 0.38). Substantially low RMT (< 2.5 mm) was measured in four (6.6%) women in the endometrial closure group and three (5.8%) of the women in the non-closure group (p = 0.86). All other uterine scar sonographic measurements, as well as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain and intermenstrual bleeding rates were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion: Closure versus non-closure of the endometrial layer during cesarean uterine incision repair has no significant difference in cesarean scar characteristics and symptom rates at 6 months follow-up.

Keywords: Cesarean scar defect; Dysmenorrhea; Endometrial layer; Intermenstrual bleeding; Residual myometrial thickness.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Cesarean Section* / adverse effects
  • Cesarean Section* / methods
  • Cicatrix* / complications
  • Cicatrix* / diagnostic imaging
  • Endometrium / diagnostic imaging
  • Endometrium / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Male
  • Pregnancy
  • Prospective Studies
  • Ultrasonography / methods
  • Uterus / diagnostic imaging
  • Uterus / surgery