Rhinoplasty, a common surgical procedure for nose reshaping, demands meticulous preoperative evaluation and precise execution. When coupled with septoplasty to address medical issues stemming from a deviated nasal septum, these procedures can lead to noteworthy postoperative complications. These encompass early issues like epistaxis and hematoma, as well as long-term challenges such as scarring and aesthetic deformities. Strategies like steroids and tranexamic acid are employed to prevent and manage these complications. A contentious aspect in postoperative care is the use of nasal packing. While some argue it aids healing and hemostasis, others avoid it due to patient discomfort. This review assesses the pros and cons of postoperative nasal packing following rhinoplasty and septoplasty. A thorough literature review spanning 2000-2023 yielded 30 relevant articles from 62. Discussion reveals that nasal packing offers limited benefits in reducing bleeding, edema and ecchymosis. In conclusion, the decision to employ nasal packing in rhinoplasty and septoplasty should be made carefully, considering patient comfort and surgical context. Evidence suggests that nasal packing may not consistently provide significant advantages and could lead to adverse outcomes. Nasal splints offer similar advantages and may be considered viable alternatives. Surgeons should tailor their approach to individual patient needs, with further research needed to refine postoperative management for these procedures.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Keywords: Complications; Nasal packing; Rhinoplasty; Rhinoseptoplasty; Septoplasty.
© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.