Use of in vitro methods combined with in silico analysis to identify potential skin sensitizers in the Tox21 10K compound library

Front Toxicol. 2024 Feb 28:6:1321857. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1321857. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: Skin sensitization, which leads to allergic contact dermatitis, is a key toxicological endpoint with high occupational and consumer prevalence. This study optimized several in vitro assays listed in OECD skin sensitization test guidelines for use on a quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) platform and performed in silico model predictions to assess the skin sensitization potential of prioritized compounds from the Tox21 10K compound library. Methods: First, we screened the entire Tox21 10K compound library using a qHTS KeratinoSensTM (KS) assay and built a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model based on the KS results. From the qHTS KS screening results, we prioritized 288 compounds to cover a wide range of structural chemotypes and tested them in the solid phase extraction-tandem mass spectrometry (SPE-MS/MS) direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), IL-8 homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) assay, CD86 and CD54 surface expression in THP1 cells, and predicted in silico sensitization potential using the OECD QSAR Toolbox (v4.5). Results: Interpreting tiered qHTS datasets using a defined approach showed the effectiveness and efficiency of in vitro methods. We selected structural chemotypes to present this diverse chemical collection and to explore previously unidentified structural contributions to sensitization potential. Discussion: Here, we provide a skin sensitization dataset of unprecedented size, along with associated tools, and analysis designed to support chemical assessments.

Keywords: Tox21 10K compound library; defined approach; machine learning; quantitative high-throughput screening KeratinoSens; quantitative structure–activity screening modeling; skin sensitization.

Grants and funding

The authors declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and Interagency Agreement IAA #NTR 12003 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)/Division of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) to the NCATS, National Institutes of Health (NIH). JS was supported by federal funds from the NIEHS, NIH, under Contract No. HHSN273201500010C to Inotiv, Inc.