Advances in Nanoarchitectonics: A Review of "Static" and "Dynamic" Particle Assembly Methods

Materials (Basel). 2024 Feb 24;17(5):1051. doi: 10.3390/ma17051051.

Abstract

Particle assembly is a promising technique to create functional materials and devices from nanoscale building blocks. However, the control of particle arrangement and orientation is challenging and requires careful design of the assembly methods and conditions. In this study, the static and dynamic methods of particle assembly are reviewed, focusing on their applications in biomaterial sciences. Static methods rely on the equilibrium interactions between particles and substrates, such as electrostatic, magnetic, or capillary forces. Dynamic methods can be associated with the application of external stimuli, such as electric fields, magnetic fields, light, or sound, to manipulate the particles in a non-equilibrium state. This study discusses the advantages and limitations of such methods as well as nanoarchitectonic principles that guide the formation of desired structures and functions. It also highlights some examples of biomaterials and devices that have been fabricated by particle assembly, such as biosensors, drug delivery systems, tissue engineering scaffolds, and artificial organs. It concludes by outlining the future challenges and opportunities of particle assembly for biomaterial sciences. This review stands as a crucial guide for scholars and professionals in the field, fostering further investigation and innovation. It also highlights the necessity for continuous research to refine these methodologies and devise more efficient techniques for nanomaterial synthesis. The potential ramifications on healthcare and technology are substantial, with implications for drug delivery systems, diagnostic tools, disease treatments, energy storage, environmental science, and electronics.

Keywords: biomaterials; dynamic methods; particle assembly; self-assembly; static methods.

Publication types

  • Review

Grants and funding

This research was funded by FWO (Research Foundation Flanders) grant numbers G043322N, I002620N, G076224N; BOF UGent (Special Research Fund of Ghent University) grant numbers BOF/IOP2022/033 and BOF23/GOA/029; FWO-F.N.R.S. EOS program grant number 40007488; FWO-SBO grant number S001423N; the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (Belspo), and the European Space Agency (ESA), grant PRODEX BoneChip.