Secukinumab in patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa based on prior biologic exposure: An efficacy and safety analysis from the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE phase III trials

Br J Dermatol. 2024 Mar 12:ljae098. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae098. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease associated with a substantial disease burden. Secukinumab has previously been reported to have sustained efficacy with a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate to severe HS. It is unknown if prior biologic exposure impacts the efficacy and safety of secukinumab.

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with moderate to severe HS based on prior exposure to biologics.

Methods: This was an analysis of the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE phase III trials of secukinumab in patients with moderate to severe HS. Patients were randomized at baseline to receive secukinumab every 2 (SECQ2W) or 4 weeks (SECQ4W), or placebo for 16 weeks. After week 16, patients receiving SECQ2W and SECQ4W remained on the same treatment regimen, while patients randomized to placebo were switched to either SECQ2W or SECQ4W up to week 52. Assessments based on prior exposure to biologics included HS clinical response (HiSCR), abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count, flare rates, HS-related pain (numeric rating scale [NRS]) 30], international HS severity scoring system (IHS4), dermatology life quality index, European quality of life five-dimension, and safety.

Results: Overall, 1084 patients were randomized in the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE trials and included in this analysis, with 255 (23.5%) patients being biologic experienced (SECQ2W [N=80]; SECQ4W [N=81]; placebo [N=94]) and 829 (76.5%) being biologic-naïve (SECQ2W [N=281]; SECQ4W [N=279]; placebo [N=269]). At week 16, responses were more efficacious for secukinumab compared with placebo for HiSCR in patients who were biologic-experienced (SECQ2W, 37.0% [odds ratio (OR): 1.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83, 3.08]; SECQ4W, 38.8% [OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 0.86, 3.22; placebo, 27.3%) and biologic-naive (SECQ2W, 45.6% [OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.15, 2.33]; SECQ4W, 45.4% [OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.13, 2.29]; placebo, 34.2%). Similar results were observed for AN count, NRS30, and IHS4-55. The higher response seen at week 16 with secukinumab was sustained, with a trend for improvement over time, through week 52 in both subgroups. Additional efficacy was observed for quality-of-life assessments, and no differences in safety between subgroups were observed.

Conclusions: Regardless of prior biologic exposure, secukinumab was efficacious in improving signs and symptoms of HS. This finding positions secukinumab as the first option in patients who are biologic-naïve, as well as in patients who have previously been treated with other biologic therapy, based on individual patient needs.

Trial registration: SUNSHINE (NCT03713619) and SUNRISE (NCT03713632).

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03713632
  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03713619