Assessment of ecotoxicological effects of Fojo coal mine waste elutriate in aquatic species (Douro Coalfield, North Portugal)

Front Toxicol. 2024 Feb 23:6:1334169. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1334169. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: The exploitation of anthracite A in the Pejão mining complex (Douro Coalfield, North Portugal) resulted in the formation of several coal waste piles without proper environmental control. In 2017, a new pedological zonation emerged in the Fojo area, after the ignition and self-burning of some of the coal waste piles, namely: unburned coal waste (UW); burned coal waste, and a cover layer (BW and CL, respectively); uphill soil (US); mixed burned coal waste (MBW); downhill soil (DS). This study aimed to evaluate the toxic effects of 25 soil elutriates from different pedological materials. Methods: Allivibrio fischeri bioluminescence inhibition assay, Lemna minor growth inhibition assay, and Daphnia magna acute assay were used to assess the toxicity effects. Additionally, total chlorophyll and malondialdehyde (MDA) content and catalase (CAT) activity were also evaluated in L. minor. Results and Discussion: The results obtained from each endpoint demonstrated the extremely heterogeneous nature of soil properties, and the species showed different sensibilities to soil elutriates, however, in general, the species showed the same sensitivity trend (A. fischeri > L. minor > D. magna). The potentially toxic elements (PTE) present in the soil elutriates (e.g., Al, Pb, Cd, Ni, Zn) affected significantly the species understudy. All elutriates revealed toxicity for A. fischeri, while US1 and UW5 were the most toxic for L. minor (growth inhibition and significant alterations in CAT activity) and D. magna (100% mortality). This study highlights the importance of studying soil aqueous phase toxicity since the mobilization and percolation of bioavailable PTE can cause environmental impacts on aquatic ecosystems and biota.

Keywords: Allivibrio fischeri; Daphnia magna; Lemna minor; coal mining; ecotoxicology.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the “SHS: Soil health surrounding former mining areas: characterization, risk analysis, and intervention” project, financed by Norte-45-2020-75-Sistema de Apoio à Investigação Científica e Tecnológica—“Projetos Estruturados de I&D”—Horizonte Europa, Ref. NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000056. This work was also supported by National Funds (through the FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology) through the strategic programs UIDB/04423/2020 and UIDP/04423/2020; UIDB/04683/2020 and UIDP/04683/2020. SCA is hired through the Regulamento do Emprego Científico e Tecnológico—RJEC from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) program (CEEC-IND/01756/2017, DOI: 10.54499/CEECIND/01756/2017/CP1420/CT0006). BSD was supported by a FCT Ph.D. grant (ref. 2022.10505.BD).