Purpose: Several studies present the unsuitability of the tilted-wire method for slice sensitivity profile (SSP) in helical scan. We compared the accuracy for SSP by the tilted-wire averaging method using multiple wire profiles and by the conventional micro-coin method.
Methods: A micro-coin phantom positioned at the center or the off-center was scanned using a 64-detector row CT scanner in different positions where an X-ray tube starts scanning. In the same way, tilted-wire averaging phantoms, approximately 70 mm in diameter, in the shape of a donut, 8 wires tilted from the circumference toward the center, were scanned. Images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm.
Results: The relative errors of full width at half maximum (FWHM) by the tilted-wire averaging method were -0.015 mm to -0.004 mm (-1.98% to -0.56%) at the center compared to those by the micro-coin method, and it is almost the same value regardless of the number of wires. Relative errors were 0.001 mm to 0.029 mm (0.11% to 3.74%) at the upper 8 cm from the center, and 0.014 mm to 0.078 mm (1.86% to 10.25%) at the upper 16 cm, and the value of relative errors increased as it got farther from the center and as the number of wires went fewer.
Conclusion: This study indicated that accurate measurement of SSP may be achieved by using 4 (arranged every 90 degrees) or more averaging wires.
Keywords: computed tomography (CT); helical scan; slice sensitivity profile (SSP); slice thickness; tilted-wire averaging method.