Pharmacological induction of autophagy reduces inflammation in macrophages by degrading immunoproteasome subunits

PLoS Biol. 2024 Mar 6;22(3):e3002537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002537. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Defective autophagy is linked to proinflammatory diseases. However, the mechanisms by which autophagy limits inflammation remain elusive. Here, we found that the pan-FGFR inhibitor LY2874455 efficiently activated autophagy and suppressed expression of proinflammatory factors in macrophages stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Multiplex proteomic profiling identified the immunoproteasome, which is a specific isoform of the 20s constitutive proteasome, as a substrate that is degraded by selective autophagy. SQSTM1/p62 was found to be a selective autophagy-related receptor that mediated this degradation. Autophagy deficiency or p62 knockdown blocked the effects of LY2874455, leading to the accumulation of immunoproteasomes and increases in inflammatory reactions. Expression of proinflammatory factors in autophagy-deficient macrophages could be reversed by immunoproteasome inhibitors, confirming the pivotal role of immunoproteasome turnover in the autophagy-mediated suppression on the expression of proinflammatory factors. In mice, LY2874455 protected against LPS-induced acute lung injury and dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis and caused low levels of proinflammatory cytokines and immunoproteasomes. These findings suggested that selective autophagy of the immunoproteasome was a key regulator of signaling via the innate immune system.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Autophagy
  • Inflammation
  • Lipopolysaccharides* / pharmacology
  • Macrophages
  • Mice
  • Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex
  • Proteomics*

Substances

  • Lipopolysaccharides
  • Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China under grant 2017YFA0506300 (to K.L.) and the National Natural Science Foundation under grant 32022020 (to K.L.) and 81902997 (to H.L.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.