Efficacy of Hydrocortisone, Povidone-Iodine, and Normal Saline as an Irrigating Solution During Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Faheem Ahmed; Shridhar D Baliga; Sulakshana S Baliga; Pranjal Rathi; Gaurav Jha

doi:10.7759/cureus.53370

Efficacy of Hydrocortisone, Povidone-Iodine, and Normal Saline as an Irrigating Solution During Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cureus. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e53370. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53370. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Authors

Faheem Ahmed¹, Shridhar D Baliga¹, Sulakshana S Baliga², Pranjal Rathi¹, Gaurav Jha³

Affiliations

¹ Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, KAHER's (KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research's) KLE Vishwanath Katti Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, IND.
² Community Medicine, KAHER'S (KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research's) Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, IND.
³ Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.

Abstract

Background The surgical removal of mandibular third molars is one of the most common procedures in dentistry. Researchers have extensively studied the treatment of postoperative sequelae such as pain, edema, trismus, and alveolar osteitis throughout the past six decades. Many approaches have been used to address clinical difficulties after third molar surgery, including various flap designs and irrigating solutions. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three irrigating solutions, hydrocortisone, povidone-iodine, and normal saline, on pain, trismus, and edema following surgical removal of the impacted mandibular third molar. Methodology The study involved 105 participants who required surgical extraction of mandibular third molars. The patients' ages ranged from 18 to 40 years, and they fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Using a simple random sampling technique, they were divided into three groups (group 1: hydrocortisone, group 2: povidone-iodine, group 3: normal saline). The parameters evaluated were edema, pain, and trismus on the second and seventh postoperative days. All data were input into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft^® Corp., Redmond, USA) worksheets and analyzed using Stata 17.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, USA). The visual analog scale (VAS) score was used to measure postoperative pain, and postoperative swelling was measured using linear measurements from four fixed anatomical points and compared to preoperative values. To assess trismus, the inter-incisal distance was measured in millimeters with a caliper. A p-value of <0.01 was considered statistically significant. Results The mean VAS score for pain in group 1 was lower than the other two groups. The effect of group 1 was significant on the second postoperative day but insignificant on the seventh postoperative day for swelling. The effect of all three groups on trismus was significant on the second and seventh days. Conclusions Hydrocortisone as an irrigating solution showed promising results in managing postoperative swelling in the first 48 hours, but its effect gradually declined by the seventh postoperative day. Additionally, it was effective in controlling postoperative pain and trismus. This suggests that utilizing hydrocortisone as an irrigating solution, compared to povidone-iodine, has been proven to be a significantly effective option in reducing postoperative pain, edema, and trismus resulting from the surgical removal of impacted teeth.

Keywords: edema; hydrocortisone; irrigation; mandibular third molar(s); normal saline; pain; postoperative; povidone iodine; surgical extraction; trismus.