Effects of H2O2 pretreatment on the elemental fingerprints of bivalve shells and their implications for the traceability of geographic origin

Renato Mamede; Carla Patinha; Patrícia Martins; Eduardo Ferreira da Silva; Ricardo Calado; Fernando Ricardo

doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25872

Effects of H₂O₂ pretreatment on the elemental fingerprints of bivalve shells and their implications for the traceability of geographic origin

Heliyon. 2024 Feb 10;10(4):e25872. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25872. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.

Authors

Renato Mamede¹, Carla Patinha², Patrícia Martins¹, Eduardo Ferreira da Silva², Ricardo Calado¹, Fernando Ricardo¹

Affiliations

¹ ECOMARE, CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Santiago University Campus, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
² GEOBIOTEC, Department of Geosciences, University of Aveiro, Santiago University Campus, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.

Abstract

The fraudulent mislabelling of seafood geographic origin has been growing due to complex supply chains and growing consumer demand. To address this issue, seafood traceability tools, such as those based on elemental fingerprints (EF) of bivalve shells, have been successfully used to confirm their harvesting location. However, despite the usefulness of these methodologies, there is still room for optimization. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of a routine procedure during bivalve shells preparation for ICP-MS analysis - their pretreatment with H₂O₂ to remove organic components. More specifically, the present study evaluated the effects of H₂O₂ on i) the elemental fingerprints of shells of two bivalve species (Ruditapes philippinarum and Cerastoderma edule) from four different locations over the north-western and the western Iberian coast, and ii) their influence on the accuracy of models (based on the EF of shells) used to confirm the geographic origin of these species. Significant differences were observed between untreated and pretreated shells of R. philippinarum (p within location ranging from 0.0001 to 0.0011) and C. edule (p ranging from 0.0001 to 0.0007 for C. edule) for both their elemental fingerprints as a whole and several individual elements. The accuracy of the models employed to determine the origin of the two bivalve species, using i) untreated shells, ii) pretreated shells, and iii) both pretreated and untreated shells grouped per location, was high, with the models accurately predicting the geographic origin of 100, 90 and 95% of R. philippinarum and 95, 100 and 95% of C. edule, respectively. These results show that the shifts in the EF of bivalve shells promoted by treating them with H₂O₂ prior to ICP-MS analysis did not affect the accuracy of the models used to confirm the geographic origin of both bivalve species. Therefore, the need to pre-treat bivalve shells with H₂O₂ can be dismissed in future studies addressing the traceability of bivalves when using ICP-MS, thus contributing to reducing environmental impacts and economic costs associated with this procedure, as well as the time required to obtain results.

Keywords: Biogeochemical tools; Hydrogen peroxide; ICP-MS; Methodological optimization; Seafood.