Evaluation of the relationship between truss/windlass mechanisms and foot stiffness while walking

Abstract

Background: The truss/windlass coefficients ware reported as a surrogate parameter for foot stiffness while walking. However, the construct validity and reliability of whether the truss/windlass coefficients reflect foot stiffness have not been sufficiently validated. This study validated the truss/windlass coefficient reflects the construct validity and reliability of foot stiffness.

Methods: Participants were 25 healthy young males (21.6 ± 0.7 years). Foot stiffness was assessed using Simplified Foot Stiffness. It was determined by dividing the difference in foot load between sitting and standing by the rate of change in navicular height. The truss/windlass coefficient was calculated as the behavior of the foot arch during middle to late stance. To assess the reliability of each parameter, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 1.1) and Bland-Altman analysis were used, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to determine construct validity.

Results: The truss coefficient (ICC1.1 0.86) and Simplified Foot Stiffness (ICC1.1 0.87) demonstrated high reliability and no systematic error. However, the windlass coefficient (ICC1.1 0.73) demonstrated moderate reliability and proportional error. Furthermore, the truss coefficient had a significant positive correlation with Simplified Foot Stiffness (r = 0.504; p < 0.01), whereas the windlass coefficient did not (r = 0.06; p = 0.67).

Conclusion: The truss coefficient was proposed as a highly reliable parameter that reflects foot stiffness. However, the windlass coefficient has a proportional error, despite being moderately reliable.

Keywords: Construct validity; Reliability; Truss mechanism; Windlass mechanism.