Comparison of the MIPS technique versus linear incision with tissue preservation in osseointegrated implants in the Ponto model®

Carmen Fernández-Cedrón Bermejo; Elena Sánchez Fernández; María Costales Marcos; Faustino José Núñez Batalla; José Luis Llorente Pendás; Justo Ramón Gómez Martínez

doi:10.1016/j.otoeng.2023.10.010

Comparison of the MIPS technique versus linear incision with tissue preservation in osseointegrated implants in the Ponto model®

Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed). 2024 Mar 1:S2173-5735(24)00038-3. doi: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2023.10.010. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Carmen Fernández-Cedrón Bermejo¹, Elena Sánchez Fernández², María Costales Marcos², Faustino José Núñez Batalla², José Luis Llorente Pendás², Justo Ramón Gómez Martínez²

Affiliations

¹ Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain. Electronic address: carmencfc@hotmail.es.
² Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.

PMID: 38432617
DOI: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2023.10.010

Abstract

Background and objectives: The surgery of osseointegrated implants has undergone different modifications over the years with the aim of achieving better results and facilitating the surgical technique. Today the most commonly used technique is the linear incision with tissue preservation and placement of the abutment and implant. The long-term success of this technique has served as the basis for the development of the so-called minimally invasive surgical approach (MIPS). This study compares the short-, medium- and long-term results between the classic linear incision technique and the MIPS technique.

Material and methods: A prospective study was conducted on patients who had an osseointegrated implant placed between February 2016 and February 2020. A total of 59 surgeries were performed, 32 surgeries according to the linear incision technique with tissue preservation and 27 with MIPS technique. Outcomes were evaluated at one week, one month and one year.

Results: Statistically significant differences were achieved between the 2 groups at one week after surgery. Eighty per cent of the MIPS patients had Holgers grades 0-1 compared to 35% of the linear technique patients (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed at one month (p = 0.457) and one year (p = 0.228). One case with grade 4 was recorded which resulted in implant extrusion one month after surgery with the MIPS technique. A new osseointegrated implant was placed 2 months after the fall using the same MIPS technique with good results. We were also able to verify that the duration of surgery was much shorter with the MIPS technique and better tolerated in terms of postoperative discomfort by the patient.

Conclusions: In our experience, the MIPS technique is the technique of choice for surgery of osseointegrated Ponto model implants as it is simpler, faster and presents fewer problems in the immediate postoperative period, with similar long-term postoperative results.

Keywords: Complicación cutánea; Implante osteointegrado; MIPS technique; Osseointegrated implant; Skin complication; Técnica MIPS.