Risk adaptive planning with biology-based constraints may lead to higher tumor control probability in tumors of the canine brain: A planning study

Abstract

Background: Classical radiation protocols are guided by physical dose delivered homogeneously over the target. Protocols are chosen to keep normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) at an acceptable level. Organs at risk (OAR) adjacent to the target volume could lead to underdosage of the tumor and a decrease of tumor control probability (TCP). The intent of our study was to explore a biology-based dose escalation: by keeping NTCP for OAR constant, radiation dose was to be maximized, allowing to result in heterogeneous dose distributions.

Methods: We used computed tomography datasets of 25 dogs with brain tumors, previously treated with 10x4 Gy (40 Gy to PTV D₅₀). We generated 3 plans for each patient: A) original treatment plan with homogeneous dose distribution, B) heterogeneous dose distribution with strict adherence to the same NTCPs as in A), and C) heterogeneous dose distribution with adherence to NTCP <5%. For plan comparison, TCPs and TCP equivalent doses (homogenous target dose which results in the same TCP) were calculated. To enable the use of the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) metric of the tumor target in plan optimization, the calculated TCP values were used to obtain the volume effect parameter a.

Results: As intended, NTCPs for all OARs did not differ from plan A) to B). In plan C), however, NTCPs were significantly higher for brain (mean 2.5% (SD±1.9, 95%CI: 1.7,3.3), p<0.001), optic chiasm (mean 2.0% (SD±2.2, 95%CI: 1.0,2.8), p=0.010) compared to plan A), but no significant increase was found for the brainstem. For 24 of 25 of the evaluated patients, the heterogenous plans B) and C) led to an increase in target dose and projected increase in TCP compared to the homogenous plan A). Furthermore, the distribution of the projected individual TCP values as a function of the dose was found to be in good agreement with the population TCP model.

Conclusion: Our study is a first step towards risk-adaptive radiation dose optimization. This strategy utilizes a biologic objective function based on TCP and NTCP instead of an objective function based on physical dose constraints.

Keywords: Biologic objective function; Biology-based; Brain tumor; Dog; IMRT; Intensity-modulated radiation therapy; NTCP; Radiation therapy; Risk-adaptive optimization; TCP.