Study objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a heterogeneous condition covering many clinical phenotypes in terms of the diversity of symptoms. Patient-based OSA screening questionnaires used in routine practice contain significantly varying contents that can impact the reliability and validity of the screening. We investigated to what extent common patient-based OSA screening questionnaires differ or overlap in their item content by conducting a rigorous, methodical, and quantified content overlap analysis.
Methods: We conducted an item content analysis of 11 OSA screening questionnaires validated in adult populations and characterized their overlap using a four-step approach: i) selection of OSA screening questionnaires; ii) item extraction and selection; iii) extraction of symptoms from items; iv) assessment of content overlap with the Jaccard Index (from 0: no overlap to 1: full overlap).
Results: We extracted 72 items that provided 25 distinct symptoms from 11 selected OSA questionnaires. The overlap between them was weak (mean Jaccard Index 0.224, ranging from 0.138 to 0.329). All questionnaires contained symptoms of the "OSA symptom" dimension (e.g., snoring or witnessed apneas). The STOP-BANG (0.329) and the Berlin (0.280) questionnaires exhibited the highest overlap content. Ten symptoms (40%) were investigated in only one questionnaire.
Conclusions: The heterogeneity of content and the low overlap across these questionnaires reflect the challenges of screening OSA. The different OSA questionnaires potentially capture varying aspects of the disorder, with the risk of biased results in studies. Suggestions are made for better OSA screening and refinement of clinical OSA phenotypes.
Keywords: content analysis; obstructive sleep apnea; questionnaires; sleep disorders; sleep symptoms; symptom overlap.
© 2024 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.