Many ecological studies examine health outcomes and disparities using administrative boundaries such as census tracts, counties, or states. These boundaries help us to understand the patterning of health by place along with impacts of policies implemented at these levels. However, additional geo-political units, or units with both geographic and political meaning, such as congressional districts, present further opportunities to connect research with public policy. We provide a step-by-step guide in how to conduct disparities-focused analysis at the congressional district level, and as an applied case study we use geocoded vital statistics data from 2010-2015 to examine levels and disparities of infant mortality (IM) and deaths of despair (DoD) in the 19 U.S. congressional districts of Pennsylvania for the 111th-112th (2009-2012) Congresses, and 18 districts for the 113th-114th (2013-2016) Congresses. We also provide recommendations for extending congressional district level analysis to other outcomes, states, and geopolitical boundaries such as state legislative districts. Increased surveillance of health outcomes at the congressional district level can help prompt policy action, advocacy, and hopefully, reduce rates and disparities in health.
Keywords: areal units; congressional districts; health disparities; mortality; political epidemiology.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.