The Role of Integrated Air Transport System in Managing Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture

Muhammad Saad Hafeez; Amanda R Phillips; Katherine M Reitz; Joshua B Brown; Francis X Guyette; Nathan L Liang

doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.02.033

The Role of Integrated Air Transport System in Managing Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Feb 24:S1078-5884(24)00191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.02.033. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Muhammad Saad Hafeez¹, Amanda R Phillips², Katherine M Reitz², Joshua B Brown³, Francis X Guyette⁴, Nathan L Liang⁵

Affiliations

¹ Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/SaadHafeez4996.
² Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
³ Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
⁴ Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
⁵ Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: liangnl@upmc.edu.

PMID: 38408516
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.02.033

Abstract

Objective: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) are highly morbid emergencies. Not all hospitals are equipped to repair them, and an air ambulance network may aid in regionalising specialty care to quaternary referral centres. The association between travel distance by air ambulance and rAAA mortality in patients transferred as an emergency for repair was examined.

Methods: A retrospective review of institutional data. Adults with rAAA (2002 - 2019) transferred from an outside hospital (OSH) to a single quaternary referral centre for repair via air ambulance were identified. Patients who arrived via ground transport or post-repair at an OSH for continued critical care were excluded. Patients were divided into near and far groups based on the 75th percentile of the straight line travel distance (> 72 miles) between hospitals. The primary outcome was 30 day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between distance and mortality after adjusting for age, sex, race, cardiovascular comorbidities, and repair type.

Results: A total of 290 patients with rAAA were transported a median distance of 40.4 miles (interquartile range 25.5, 72.7) with 215 (74.1%) near and 75 (25.9%) far patients. Both the near and far groups had similar ages, sex, and race. There was no difference in pre-operative loss of consciousness, intubation, or cardiac arrest between groups. Endovascular aneurysm repair utilisation and intra-operative aortic occlusion balloon use were also similar. Neither the observed (26.8% vs. 23.9%, p = .61) nor the adjusted odds ratio (0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.36 - 1.39, p = .32) 30 day mortality rate differed significantly between the near and far groups.

Conclusion: Increasing distance travelled during transfer by air ambulance was not associated with worse outcomes in patients with rAAA. The findings support the regionalisation of rAAA repair to large quaternary centres via an integrated and robust air ambulance network.

Keywords: Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Air ambulance; Aortic repair; Aortic rupture; Emergency; Patient transfer; Policy.