Efficacy of Hypertonic Dextrose Proliferation Therapy for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Lesions: A Meta-Analysis

Altern Ther Health Med. 2024 Feb 9:AT9386. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Background: One of the most prevalent disorders of the shoulder is rotator cuff tendinosis, which is a major contributor to shoulder discomfort and shoulder joint dysfunction. Rotator cuff tendinosis occurs in 0.3% to 5.5% of people worldwide and is diagnosed in 0.5% to 7.4% of people in China annually. We performed a meta-analysis to assess whether hypertonic dextrose proliferation therapy, a form of prolotherapy, improves the well-being of patients with rotator cuff injuries.

Methods: We screened the literature by searching the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for the search terms prolotherapy, hypertonic dextrose, and rotator cuff. We identified and evaluated studies that treated individuals with rotator cuff lesions with hypertonic dextrose proliferation therapy (intervention) or a placebo (control). The outcome measures for patients with rotator cuff lesions were the visual analog scale score, the shoulder pain and disability index, and other metrics. These metrics were used to evaluate the effects of hypertonic dextrose proliferation therapy on individuals with rotator cuff diseases by meta-analysis.

Results: The meta-analysis used data from 6 studies. In the 6 studies, the visual analog scale scores improved in the intervention and control categories, with greater improvement for the intervention category compared with the control category (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.10 [95% CI, 0.37-1.83]; P = .04). In the studies that measured other outcomes, greater improvement for the intervention category compared with the control category was seen for the shoulder pain and disability index score (SMD, 8.13 [95% CI, 5.34-10.91]; P < .01), flexion (SMD, 5.73 [95% CI, 0.99-10.47]; P < .01), and abduction (SMD, 6.49 [95% CI, 0.66-12.31]; P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences of internal rotation between the intervention and control categories (SMD, -1.74 [95% CI, -4.25 to 0.78]; P = .18) and external rotation (SMD, 2.78 [95% CI, -0.13 to 5.69]; P = .06).

Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that individuals with rotator cuff injuries may benefit from hypertonic dextrose proliferation therapy based on the visual analog scale score, the shoulder pain and disability index score, flexion, and abduction. These results must, nevertheless, be supported by high-caliber follow-up research.