Background: In our published randomized controlled trial, we revealed that patients with acute ASIA Grade C incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) who underwent early surgery (within 24 h post-injury) had accelerated motor recovery at six months than those with delayed surgery (>2 weeks post-injury); however, neuropathic pain (NeP) worsened regardless of surgery timing. Here, we conducted post-hoc analyses to intensively assess NeP development and maintenance.
Methods: Of 44 patients (median 64.5 years; three female; early intervention, n = 26), NeP was categorized into at-level and below-level pain and evaluated at two weeks and one year after injury using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). We compared the two groups based on background characteristics. A mixed-design analysis of variance with sex as a covariate was conducted to analyze motor recovery and Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in groups with severe (NPSI ≥ 10) or mild (NPSI < 10) pain.
Results: Upper and lower limb motor impairments were comparable between both groups regardless of pain severity. Severe at-level pain remained stable and worsened at one year than mild at-level pain; however, the upper- and lower-limb motor scores and HRQOL had comparable recovery. Background characteristics did not affect severity or time course of NeP. Patients with severe below-level pain demonstrated slower lower-limb motor recovery than those with mild below-level pain, whereas HRQOL improved regardless of pain severity.
Conclusions: Both at-level and below-level NeP developed and persisted relatively early in the course of traumatic SCI with incomplete motor paralysis; their severities worsened over time or remained severe since onset.
Keywords: Acute cervical spinal cord injury; At-level pain; Below-level pain; Motor recovery; Neuropathic pain.