Osteosarcoma stands as one of the primary mesenchymal bone neoplasms commonly encountered in clinical practice. This malignancy often presents with a wide range of distinctive imaging characteristics. Here, we present a unique case wherein a delayed diagnosis of high-grade osteosarcoma occurred due to the absence of an osteoid matrix in the initial imaging studies. A 61-year-old female, initially presented with a left humeral fracture. As the healing of the fractured bone was delayed and the possibility of a pathologic fracture was considered, a CT-guided biopsy was performed. Histological examination of the biopsy sample initially suggested an osseous leiomyosarcoma. The lack of osteoid matrix on radiographs including aggressive intra-medullary mass seen on MRI, combined with the patient's age, appeared consistent with a diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma of bone. As a result, the initial diagnosis was not called into question. Due to neurovascular involvement, this led to a forequarter amputation. However, upon microscopic examination of the amputation specimen, certain areas exhibited features indicative of malignant osteoid deposition, ultimately supporting a revised diagnosis of high-grade osteosarcoma. This case underscores the critical importance of considering the limitations of core biopsy samples, especially when dealing with suspected limb masses associated with pathological fractures. Radiographs and CT scans can prove invaluable in ruling out subtle adjacent osteoid, and ultimately a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of osteosarcoma is imperative to ensure accurate identification.
Keywords: conventional osteosarcoma; ct guided biopsy; leiomyosarcoma; osteoid matrix; pathological fracture.
Copyright © 2024, Yan et al.