Background: Surgical methods for patients with osteoporotic fracture vertebral collapse complicated with neurological dysfunction are still a topic of debate. We designed an improved osteotomy for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fracture patients with neurological dysfunction. Compared with traditional osteotomy methods such as pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and bone-disc-bone osteotomy (BDBO), the osteotomy range is reduced. Therefore, we use a finite element method to analyze the biomechanical conditions of these three osteotomy methods and provide a mechanical theoretical basis for the surgical treatment of these three osteotomy methods.
Methods: Based on the CT scan of a patient with L1 osteoporotic fracture vertebral collapse and neurological dysfunction, the finite element model was constructed by importing Mimics software, and three different osteotomy models were established. The forces and displacements of internal fixation device, T1-L5 whole segment, T10 vertebral body, and T10/11 intervertebral disc were recorded under different working conditions.
Results: The displacement levels of internal fixation device, T1-L5 spine, T10 vertebral body, and T10/11 intervertebral disc in the modified osteotomy group were between BDBO group and PSO group. The stress in BDBO group was concentrated in titanium mesh and its maximum stress was much higher than that in PSO group and modified osteotomy group. The mechanical distribution of T10/11 intervertebral disc showed that the maximum stress distribution of the three osteotomy methods was similar.
Conclusion: The relatively simple modified osteotomy has certain advantages in stress and displacement. In contrast, the stability of BDBO group was poor, especially in the lumbar intervertebral disc and lumbar body. For this type of osteotomy patients, it is recommended to avoid postoperative flexion so as not to increase the load.
Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.