Polymerization efficiency of different bulk-fill resin composites cured by monowave and polywave light-curing units: a comparative study

Quintessence Int. 2024 Apr 25;55(4):264-272. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b4984231.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective was to evaluate the polymerization efficiency of different bulk-fill resin-based composites cured by monowave and polywave light-curing units, by assessment of the degree of conversion and Vickers microhardness at different depths.

Method and materials: Two commercially available bulk-fill resin-based composites were used: Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative (3M ESPE) and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar Vivadent). The light-curing units utilized were two LED light-curing units: a monowave LED light-curing unit (BlueLEX LD-105, Monitex) and a polywave LED light-curing unit (Twin Wave GT-2000, Monitex). For each test, 20 cylindrical specimens (4 mm diameter, 4 mm thickness) were prepared from each bulk-fill resin-based composite using a split Teflon mold. Ten specimens were light-cured by the monowave light-curing unit and the other ten were light-cured by the polywave light-curing unit according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) was used to assess the degree of conversion, and a Vickers microhardness tester was used to assess Vickers microhardness. Statistical analysis was performed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests (P < .05).

Results: The degree of conversion and Vickers microhardness in bulk-fill resin-based composites containing only camphorquinone as photoinitiator were similar when cured with either monowave or polywave light-curing units. However, bulk-fill resin-based composites containing a combination of photoinitiators exhibited significantly higher degree of conversion and Vickers microhardness when cured with a polywave light-curing unit. Although all groups showed statistically significant differences between the top and bottom surfaces regarding degree of conversion and Vickers microhardness, all of them showed bottom/top ratios > 80% regarding degree of conversion and Vickers microhardness.

Conclusion: The polywave light-curing unit enhanced the polymerization efficiency of bulk-fill resin-based composites especially when the latter contained a combination of photoinitiators, but does not prevent the use of a monowave light-curing unit.

Keywords: Vickers microhardness; bulk-fill resin-based composite; degree of conversion; light-curing unit; photoinitiator.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Composite Resins* / chemistry
  • Composite Resins* / radiation effects
  • Curing Lights, Dental*
  • Hardness*
  • Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives / methods
  • Materials Testing*
  • Polymerization*
  • Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
  • Surface Properties

Substances

  • Composite Resins
  • Tetric ceram
  • Filtek Bulk Fill