Experiences of Simulated Patients Involved in Difficult Conversations With Undergraduate and Postgraduate Health Professionals

Laura A Wiechula; Anna Chur-Hansen; Ellen L Davies

doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000784

Experiences of Simulated Patients Involved in Difficult Conversations With Undergraduate and Postgraduate Health Professionals

Simul Healthc. 2024 Feb 12. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000784. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Laura A Wiechula¹, Anna Chur-Hansen, Ellen L Davies

Affiliation

¹ From the School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences (L.A.W., A.C.-H.), The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Adelaide Health Simulation, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences (E.L.D.), The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

PMID: 38345367
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000784

Abstract

Introduction: Simulated patients (SPs) are trained to simulate real patient scenarios for health professionals' education and training. The value of including SPs in simulated scenarios, particularly in relation to difficult and complex conversations, has been studied in various contexts, with a focus on learner experiences and outcomes. What has not been as extensively explored is the impact of difficult and complex conversations on the SPs. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives, motivations, and experiences of SPs, particularly regarding difficult or complex conversations.

Methods: A qualitative approach was taken to gather and interpret SP experiences. Open-ended interviews were the primary means of obtaining data. Thematic analysis guided the interpretation of interview data to generate key themes that encapsulated the SP experience.

Results: Twelve participants shared their experiences of working as SPs in scenarios that involved difficult or complex conversations. From these data, 4 major themes were determined: Care for Students, Pedagogical Focus, Emotional Regulation, and Organizational Environment. The importance of empathy and safe design and support for simulations was apparent.

Conclusions: This study presents insights into the experiences and perspectives of SPs regarding difficult and complex conversations. Participants highlighted the necessity of uniformity in standards of practice in simulation and the need for advocacy for awareness of simulation-based practices.