Comparison of four value sets derived using different TTO and DCE approaches: application to the new region-specific PBM, AP-7D

Takeru Shiroiwa; Tatsunori Murata; Yasuhiro Morii; Eri Hoshino; Takashi Fukuda

doi:10.1186/s12955-024-02233-2

Comparison of four value sets derived using different TTO and DCE approaches: application to the new region-specific PBM, AP-7D

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Feb 10;22(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02233-2.

Authors

Takeru Shiroiwa¹, Tatsunori Murata², Yasuhiro Morii³, Eri Hoshino⁴, Takashi Fukuda³

Affiliations

¹ Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health (C2H), National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako, Saitama, 351-0197, Japan. t.shiroiwa@gmail.com.
² Crecon Medical Assessment Inc, 2-12-15, Shibuya, Tokyo, Shibuya-Ku, 150-0002, Japan.
³ Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health (C2H), National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako, Saitama, 351-0197, Japan.
⁴ Division of Policy Evaluation, Department of Health Policy, Research Institute, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-Ku, Tokyo, 157-0074, Japan.

PMID: 38341575
DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02233-2

Abstract

Background: AP-7D is a newly developed preference-based measure (PBM) in East and Southeast Asia. However, no value set has been established yet. Comparison of the characteristics of value sets obtained by different methods is necessary to consider the most appropriate methodology for valuation survey of AP-7D.

Method: We surveyed the general population's preference of AP-7D health states by four valuation methods (a) composite time trade-off (cTTO); (b) simple discrete choice experiment (DCE); (c) DCE with duration; and (d) ternary DCE. In Japan, we collected approximately 1,000 samples for cTTO tasks through a face-to-face survey and 2,500 samples for each of the three DCE tasks. Respondents were selected through quota sampling based on the sex and age. The cTTO data were analyzed using a linear mixed and tobit model; the DCE data were analyzed using a simple and panel conditional logit model. Where the results of the analysis showed inconsistencies, a constrained model was used.

Results: Since all the unconstrained models, except simple DCE, showed one or more inconsistencies, the constrained model was used for the analyses. The minimum values for the models were as follows: TTO model, -0.101; simple DCE model, -0.106; DCE with duration model, -0.706; ternary DCE model, -0.306. The score for the DCE with the duration model was much lower than that for the other models. Although the value sets for AP-7D differed among the four valuation methods, the ternary DCE model showed intermediate characteristics between those of the cTTO and DCE with duration models. As compared with to EQ-5D-5L, the distributions of all the scores on the Japanese AP-7D moved to the left. Although "Energy" was one of the domains with the least influence on the AP-7D score in all four models, "Burden to others" had the largest impact on the preferences.

Conclusion: We constructed four value sets using different TTO and DCE methods. Our findings are expected not only to contribute to the development of AP-7D, but also other preference-based measures.

Keywords: AP-7D; DCE; Preference-based measure; QALY; TTO.

MeSH terms

Health Status*
Humans
Japan
Quality of Life*
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors