Retrospective Study of the Prevalence, Histopathology, Therapy, and Survival Time of Neoplastic Disease in Fish

Animals (Basel). 2024 Jan 31;14(3):464. doi: 10.3390/ani14030464.

Abstract

This study evaluated neoplasia in fish using medical records from zoos, aquariums, and exotic animal veterinarians. The parameters evaluated included geographic location, habitat type, signalment, anatomic location of neoplasia, type of neoplasia as confirmed with histologic examination, survival time, and treatments provided for each patient. These data were entered into the Exotic Species Cancer Research Alliance (ESCRA) database. Out of 455 cases from across the United States and England, most animals submitted were from zoologic parks or aquariums (62.9%), followed by private ownership (1.5%). The percent of female (19.3%) and male (17.8%) patients were similar, and the mean age at the time of diagnosis was 99.45 months, with a range of 12 to 300 months. The species with the highest neoplasia prevalence was koi (18.5%), followed by goldfish (10.8%). The eye was the most commonly reported site for a primary neoplasm (8.4%), and the most prevalent diagnosis across all organ systems was soft tissue sarcoma (26.2%). Only 13 patients in this study (2.9%) received any form of treatment, with a mean survival time of 8.85 months post-treatment. These data demonstrate that while information related to clinical therapy of cancer in fish species is lacking, surgical excision of tumors in fish, when feasible for the patient and client, may improve patient outcomes.

Keywords: aquarium; cancer; carcionoma; fish; histopathology; neoplasia; pathology; sarcoma; shark; zoo.

Grants and funding

Funding for this project was provided by the NC State Veterinary Scholars Program and the Boehringer Ingleheim Veterinary Scholars Program. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number U54CA217376 for T.M.H., E.D., L.M.A. and A.B. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. L.M.A. received funding from University of Utah Department of Pediatrics Research Enterprise.