Morphometric study applied to testicular and epididymis hydatids torsion

Abstract

Twisted testicular appendages had difficult differential diagnosis with testicular torsion. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the number, shape, size and determine the laterality pattern of the testicular and epididymal hydatids and evaluate the correlations between the length and width of the testicular and epididymal hydatids with testicular measurements. We analyzed 60 fixed cadavers and 16 patients with prostate cancer without previous hormonal treatment undergoing bilateral orchiectomy, totalizing 76 units and 152 testicles. In relation to the testicular appendices, we analyzed the following situations: absence of testicular and epididymis appendages, presence of a testicular appendix, presence of epididymis appendix, and presence of testicular and epididymis appendix. We measured the length, width and thickness of the testis and classified the appendages as sessile or pedicled. Chi-square test was used to verify associations between categorical variables. McNemar Test was used to verify differences between the percentages of right and left appendages. Correlations between quantitative measures were evaluated using the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (p < 0.05). In 50 cases (65.78%) we observed the presence of some type of appendices, in 34 cases (44.72%) we observed the presence of testicular appendices and in 19 cases (25%) the presence of epididymal appendices. We observed the presence of pedicled appendices in 39 cases (51.32%), with 25 of the cases (32.89%) of pedicled testicular appendices and 14 of the cases (18.42%) of pedicled epididymal appendages, with a significant association between the occurrence of appendices on the right and left sides (p < 0.001). Testicular hydatids were present in around two thirds of our sample being pedunculated in almost half of the cases with bilateral similarity. There is a significant chance in cases of twisted appendices that the same anatomical characteristics are present on the opposite side, which is a factor that tends to indicate the need for contralateral surgical exploration in cases of torsion, however studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these findings.