With the rapid rise in the incidence of micropapillary carcinoma, there is increasing concern about its overdiagnosis and overtreatment. There is considerable interest in managing patients with micropapillary carcinoma with active surveillance or deferred intervention. Various institutions around the world are practicing active surveillance. The major question remains as to who the ideal candidates are and how best to monitor these patients. This clinical review will discuss the ideal, appropriate, and inappropriate patients for active surveillance. It will also discuss the follow-up strategy for these patients and some of the adverse clinical features that will be used to decide against active surveillance. There are uncertainties as to who should be offered active surveillance. Various studies have shown approximately 10% of the patients switching to surgery primarily related to fear factor rather than increase in the tumor size or lymph node metastasis. The results of immediate surgery do raise issues related to complications of thyroid surgery and quality of life. The most ideal candidate would be patients with a tumor below 1 cm, intrathyroidal. For the patient who is a minimalist, the follow up strategy includes, ultrasound every 6 months for the first 1 or 2 years, and then every year after that. If there is a substantial change in the tumor volume or nodal metastasis, surgery should be considered, which happens in less than 10 percent of patients according to many studies. Based on existing literature and clinical experience, it appears that active surveillance is an appropriate strategy for monitoring micropapillary carcinoma.
Keywords: Micropapillary carcinoma; active surveillance; conservative treatment; deferred intervention; thyroid cancer.
2024 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.