Characterizing collective physical distancing in the U.S. during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic

PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Feb 6;3(2):e0000430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000430. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic offers an unprecedented natural experiment providing insights into the emergence of collective behavioral changes of both exogenous (government mandated) and endogenous (spontaneous reaction to infection risks) origin. Here, we characterize collective physical distancing-mobility reductions, minimization of contacts, shortening of contact duration-in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the pre-vaccine era by analyzing de-identified, privacy-preserving location data for a panel of over 5.5 million anonymized, opted-in U.S. devices. We define five indicators of users' mobility and proximity to investigate how the emerging collective behavior deviates from typical pre-pandemic patterns during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyze both the dramatic changes due to the government mandated mitigation policies and the more spontaneous societal adaptation into a new (physically distanced) normal in the fall 2020. Using the indicators here defined we show that: a) during the COVID-19 pandemic, collective physical distancing displayed different phases and was heterogeneous across geographies, b) metropolitan areas displayed stronger reductions in mobility and contacts than rural areas; c) stronger reductions in commuting patterns are observed in geographical areas with a higher share of teleworkable jobs; d) commuting volumes during and after the lockdown period negatively correlate with unemployment rates; and e) increases in contact indicators correlate with future values of new deaths at a lag consistent with epidemiological parameters and surveillance reporting delays. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the framework and indicators here presented can be used to analyze large-scale social distancing phenomena, paving the way for their use in future pandemics to analyze and monitor the effects of pandemic mitigation plans at the national and international levels.

Grants and funding

MC and AV acknowledge support from COVID Supplement CDC-HHS-6U01IP001137-01 and Google Cloud and Google Cloud Research Credits program to fund this project. A.V. acknowledges support from the McGovern Foundation and the Chleck Family Foundation. The findings and conclusions in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the funding agencies, the National Institutes of Health or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. TER, LT, and TL were supported in part by NSF IIS-1741197, Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-13-2-0045, and Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering under Air Force Contract No. FA8702-15- D-0001. None of the funders played any role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.