Schizophrenia results in part from a failure of prefrontal networks but we lack full understanding of how disruptions at a synaptic level cause failures at the network level. This is a crucial gap in our understanding because it prevents us from discovering how genetic mutations and environmental risks that alter synaptic function cause prefrontal network to fail in schizophrenia. To address that question, we developed a recurrent spiking network model of prefrontal local circuits that can explain the link between NMDAR synaptic and 0-lag spike synchrony deficits we recently observed in a pharmacological monkey model of prefrontal network failure in schizophrenia. We analyze how the balance between AMPA and NMDA components of recurrent excitation and GABA inhibition in the network influence oscillatory spike synchrony to inform the biological data. We show that reducing recurrent NMDAR synaptic currents prevents the network from shifting from a steady to oscillatory state in response to extrinsic inputs such as might occur during behavior. These findings strongly parallel dynamic modulation of 0-lag spike synchrony we observed between neurons in monkey prefrontal cortex during behavior, as well as the suppression of this 0-lag spiking by administration of NMDAR antagonists. As such, our cortical network model provides a plausible mechanism explaining the link between NMDAR synaptic and 0-lag spike synchrony deficits observed in a pharmacological monkey model of prefrontal network failure in schizophrenia.
Keywords: NMDAR; asynchronous network; excitation - inhibition balance; neuroscience; rhesus macaque; spike synchrony; spiking network model; synchronous network.
Schizophrenia is a long-term mental health condition that can cause a person to see, hear or believe things that are not real. Although researchers do not fully understand the causes of schizophrenia, it is known to disrupt synapses, which connect neurons in the brain to form circuits that carry out a specific function when activated. This disruption alters the pattern of activity among the neurons, distorting the way that information is processed and leading to symptoms. Development of schizophrenia is thought to be due to interactions between many factors, including genetic makeup, changes in how the brain matures during development, and environmental stress. Despite animal studies revealing how neural circuits can fail at the level of individual cells, it remains difficult to predict or understand the complex ways that this damage affects advanced brain functions. Previous research in monkeys showed that mimicking schizophrenia using a drug that blocks a particular type of synapse prevented neurons from coordinating their activity. However, this did not address how synaptic and cellular changes lead to disrupted neural circuits. To better understand this, Crowe et al. developed a computational model of neural circuits to study how they respond to synapse disruption. To replicate the brain, the model consisted of two types of neurons – those that activate connecting cells in response to received signals and those that suppress them. This model could replicate the complex network behavior that causes brain cells to respond to sensory inputs. Increasing the strength of inputs to the network caused it to switch from a state in which the cells fired independently to one where the cells fired at the same time. As was previously seen in monkeys, blocking a particular type of synapse thought to be involved in schizophrenia prevented the cells from coordinating their signaling. The findings suggest that schizophrenia-causing factors can reduce the ability of neurons to fire at the same instant. Disrupting this process could lead to weaker and fewer synapses forming during brain development or loss of synapses in adults. If that is the case, and scientists can understand how factors combine to trigger this process, the mechanism of coordinated activity failure revealed by the model could help identify treatments that prevent or reverse the synapse disruption seen in schizophrenia.
© 2024, Crowe et al.