Discussions with patients about referral pathways and costs in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in Victoria, Australia

Aust J Gen Pract. 2024 Jan-Feb;53(1-2):70-77. doi: 10.31128/AJGP/01-23-6691.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) survival in Australia differs by health insurance status, but why this occurs is uncertain. There are growing concerns about out-of-pocket healthcare costs. We examined patient experiences of referral pathways to diagnosis and treatment of CRC in Victoria, Australia, and discussions about costs, comparing public, private and mixed healthcare system users.

Method: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 16 purposively sampled, English-speaking patients aged ≥40 years with CRC. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results: Private patients described greater out-of-pocket expenses balanced by greater choice of provider and access. Public patients perceived limited choice in their diagnostic or treatment provider, although some considered switching systems. Patients trusted their general practitioner or specialist for referrals. Discussions about costs did not meet guideline recommendations.

Discussion: There are limited opportunities for informed decision making about public versus private care for cancer diagnosis and treatment, which could contribute to inequalities in outcomes.

MeSH terms

  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / diagnosis
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / therapy
  • Delivery of Health Care*
  • Humans
  • Qualitative Research
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Victoria