Intra-lineage microevolution of Wolbachia leads to the emergence of new cytoplasmic incompatibility patterns

PLoS Biol. 2024 Feb 5;22(2):e3002493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002493. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Mosquitoes of the Culex pipiens complex are worldwide vectors of arbovirus, filarial nematodes, and avian malaria agents. In these hosts, the endosymbiotic bacteria Wolbachia induce cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), i.e., reduced embryo viability in so-called incompatible crosses. Wolbachia infecting Culex pipiens (wPip) cause CI patterns of unparalleled complexity, associated with the amplification and diversification of cidA and cidB genes, with up to 6 different gene copies described in a single wPip genome. In wPip, CI is thought to function as a toxin-antidote (TA) system where compatibility relies on having the right antidotes (CidA) in the female to bind and neutralize the male's toxins (CidB). By repeating crosses between Culex isofemale lines over a 17 years period, we documented the emergence of a new compatibility type in real time and linked it to a change in cid genes genotype. We showed that loss of specific cidA gene copies in some wPip genomes results in a loss of compatibility. More precisely, we found that this lost antidote had an original sequence at its binding interface, corresponding to the original sequence at the toxin's binding interface. We showed that these original cid variants are recombinant, supporting a role for recombination rather than point mutations in rapid CI evolution. These results strongly support the TA model in natura, adding to all previous data acquired with transgenes expression.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antidotes / metabolism
  • Culex*
  • Cytoplasm
  • Female
  • Male
  • Mosquito Vectors / genetics
  • Wolbachia* / genetics

Substances

  • Antidotes

Supplementary concepts

  • Culex pipiens

Grants and funding

This work was funded by the French MUSE project from the Université de Montpellier (reference ANR-16-IDEX-0006)(granted to MW). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.