Characterizing transcriptomic responses to sediment stress across location and morphology in reef-building corals

PeerJ. 2024 Jan 30:12:e16654. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16654. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities increase sediment suspended in the water column and deposition on reefs can be largely dependent on colony morphology. Massive and plating corals have a high capacity to trap sediments, and active removal mechanisms can be energetically costly. Branching corals trap less sediment but are more susceptible to light limitation caused by suspended sediment. Despite deleterious effects of sediments on corals, few studies have examined the molecular response of corals with different morphological characteristics to sediment stress. To address this knowledge gap, this study assessed the transcriptomic responses of branching and massive corals in Florida and Hawai'i to varying levels of sediment exposure. Gene expression analysis revealed a molecular responsiveness to sediments across species and sites. Differential Gene Expression followed by Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis identified that branching corals had the largest transcriptomic response to sediments, in developmental processes and metabolism, while significantly enriched GO terms were highly variable between massive corals, despite similar morphologies. Comparison of DEGs within orthogroups revealed that while all corals had DEGs in response to sediment, there was not a concerted gene set response by morphology or location. These findings illuminate the species specificity and genetic basis underlying coral susceptibility to sediments.

Keywords: Corals; Morphology; RNASeq; Sediment; Transcriptomics.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anthozoa* / genetics
  • Coral Reefs
  • Gene Expression Profiling
  • Transcriptome / genetics
  • Water

Substances

  • Water

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, NSF HDR Awards #1939795 and #1939263, and an NSF GRFP. The Tufts Data Intensive Studies Center (Tufts DISC) supported part of the APC for this article. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.