[Clinical repair strategy for ischial tuberosity pressure ulcers based on the sinus tract condition and range of skin and soft tissue defects]

Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2024 Jan 20;40(1):64-71. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231114-00194.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical repair strategy for ischial tuberosity pressure ulcers based on the sinus tract condition and range of skin and soft tissue defects. Methods: The study was a retrospective observational study. From July 2017 to March 2023, 21 patients with stage Ⅲ or Ⅳ ischial tuberosity pressure ulcers who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, including 13 males and 8 females, aged 14-84 years. There were 31 ischial tuberosity pressure ulcers, with an area of 1.5 cm×1.0 cm-8.0 cm×6.0 cm. After en bloc resection and debridement, the range of skin and soft tissue defect was 6.0 cm×3.0 cm-15.0 cm×8.0 cm. According to the depth and size of sinus tract and range of skin and soft tissue defects on the wound after debridement, the wounds were repaired according to the following three conditions. (1) When there was no sinus tract or the sinus tract was superficial, with a skin and soft tissue defect range of 6.0 cm×3.0 cm-8.5 cm×6.5 cm, the wound was repaired by direct suture, Z-plasty, transfer of buttock local flap, or V-Y advancement of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flap. (2) When the sinus tract was deep and small, with a skin and soft tissue defect range of 8.5 cm×4.5 cm-11.0 cm×6.5 cm, the wound was repaired by the transfer and filling of gracilis muscle flap followed by direct suture, or Z-plasty, or combined with transfer of inferior gluteal artery perforator flap. (3) When the sinus tract was deep and large, with a skin and soft tissue defect range of 7.5 cm×5.5 cm-15.0 cm×8.0 cm, the wound was repaired by the transfer and filling of gracilis muscle flap and gluteus maximus muscle flap transfer, followed by direct suture, Z-plasty, or combined with transfer of buttock local flap; and transfer and filling of biceps femoris long head muscle flap combined with rotary transfer of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flap; and filling of the inferior gluteal artery perforator adipofascial flap transfer combined with V-Y advancement of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flap. A total of 7 buttock local flaps with incision area of 8.0 cm×6.0 cm-19.0 cm×16.0 cm, 21 gracilis muscle flaps with incision area of 18.0 cm×3.0 cm-24.0 cm×5.0 cm, 9 inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps or inferior gluteal artery perforator adipofascial flaps with incision area of 8.5 cm×6.0 cm-13.0 cm×7.5 cm, 10 gluteal maximus muscle flaps with incision area of 8.0 cm×5.0 cm-13.0 cm×7.0 cm, 2 biceps femoris long head muscle flaps with incision area of 17.0 cm×3.0 cm and 20.0 cm×5.0 cm, and 5 posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flaps with incision area of 12.0 cm×6.5 cm-21.0 cm×10.0 cm were used. The donor area wounds were directly sutured. The survival of muscle flap, adipofascial flap, and flap, and wound healing in the donor area were observed after operation. The recovery of pressure ulcer and recurrence of patients were followed up. Results: After surgery, all the buttock local flaps, gracilis muscle flaps, gluteus maximus muscle flaps, inferior gluteal artery perforator adipofascial flaps, and biceps femoris long head muscle flaps survived well. In one case, the distal part of one posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flap was partially necrotic, and the wound was healed after dressing changes. In another patient, bruises developed in the distal end of inferior gluteal artery perforator flap. It was somewhat relieved after removal of some sutures, but a small part of the necrosis was still present, and the wound was healed after bedside debridement and suture. The other posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flaps and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps survived well. In one patient, the wound at the donor site caused incision dehiscence due to postoperative bleeding in the donor area. The wound was healed after debridement+Z-plasty+dressing change. The wounds in the rest donor areas of patients were healed well. After 3 to 15 months of follow-up, all the pressure ulcers of patients were repaired well without recurrence. Conclusions: After debridement of ischial tuberosity pressure ulcer, if there is no sinus tract formation or sinus surface is superficial, direct suture, Z-plasty, buttock local flap, or V-Y advancement repair of posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flap can be selected according to the range of skin and soft tissue defects. If the sinus tract of the wound is deep, the proper tissue flap can be selected to fill the sinus tract according to the size of sinus tract and range of the skin and soft tissue defects, and then the wound can be closed with individualized flap to obtain good repair effect.

目的: 探讨基于窦道情况及皮肤软组织缺损范围的坐骨结节压疮临床修复策略。 方法: 该研究为回顾性观察性研究。2017年7月—2023年3月,南昌大学第一附属医院收治21例符合入选标准的坐骨结节Ⅲ、Ⅳ期压疮患者,其中男13例、女8例,年龄14~84岁。共有坐骨结节压疮31处,清创前压疮面积为1.5 cm×1.0 cm~8.0 cm×6.0 cm。行en bloc切除清创后,皮肤软组织缺损范围为6.0 cm×3.0 cm~15.0 cm×8.0 cm。根据清创后创面窦道深浅、大小及皮肤软组织缺损范围,按以下3种情况修复创面。(1)无窦道或窦道浅、皮肤软组织缺损范围为6.0 cm×3.0 cm~8.5 cm×6.5 cm者,行直接拉拢缝合、Z字改形术、臀部局部皮瓣转移或股后皮神经营养血管皮瓣V-Y推进修复。(2)窦道深且小、皮肤软组织缺损范围为8.5 cm×4.5 cm~11.0 cm×6.5 cm者,行股薄肌肌瓣转移填塞后直接拉拢缝合或Z字改形术或联合臀下动脉穿支皮瓣转移修复。(3)窦道深且大、皮肤软组织缺损范围为7.5 cm×5.5 cm~15.0 cm×8.0 cm者,行股薄肌肌瓣联合臀大肌肌瓣转移填塞后直接拉拢缝合或Z字改形术或联合臀部局部皮瓣转移修复,行股二头肌长头肌瓣转移填塞后联合股后皮神经营养血管皮瓣旋转修复,行臀下动脉穿支脂肪筋膜瓣转移填塞后联合股后皮神经营养血管皮瓣V-Y推进修复。共使用7个臀部局部皮瓣(切取面积为8.0 cm×6.0 cm~19.0 cm×16.0 cm)、21个股薄肌肌瓣(切取面积为18.0 cm×3.0 cm~24.0 cm×5.0 cm)、9个臀下动脉穿支皮瓣或臀下动脉穿支脂肪筋膜瓣(切取面积为8.5 cm×6.0 cm~13.0 cm×7.5 cm)、10个臀大肌肌瓣(切取面积为8.0 cm×5.0 cm~13.0 cm×7.0 cm)、2个股二头肌长头肌瓣(切取面积为17.0 cm×3.0 cm、20.0 cm×5.0 cm)、5个股后皮神经营养血管皮瓣(切取面积为12.0 cm×6.5 cm~21.0 cm×10.0 cm)。将供区创面直接拉拢缝合。术后观察肌瓣、脂肪筋膜瓣、皮瓣存活情况及供区创面愈合情况,随访患者压疮修复情况及有无复发。 结果: 术后,所有臀部局部皮瓣、股薄肌肌瓣、臀大肌肌瓣、臀下动脉穿支脂肪筋膜瓣及股二头肌长头肌瓣均存活良好。1例患者1个股后皮神经营养血管皮瓣远端部分坏死,经换药后创面愈合;1例患者1个臀下动脉穿支皮瓣远端出现淤紫,经拆除部分缝线后有所缓解,但仍出现少部分坏死,经床旁清创缝合后创面愈合;其余股后皮神经营养血管皮瓣及臀下动脉穿支皮瓣存活良好。1例患者供区创面因术后出血导致切口开裂,经清创+Z字改形术+换药后愈合;其余患者供区创面愈合良好。随访3~15个月,所有患者压疮均得到修复且未复发。 结论: 坐骨结节压疮清创后创面若无窦道形成或窦道表浅,可根据皮肤软组织缺损范围选择直接拉拢缝合、Z字改形术、臀部局部皮瓣转移或股后皮神经营养血管皮瓣V-Y推进修复;若窦道深,则可根据窦道大小及皮肤软组织缺损范围,选择合适的组织瓣转移填塞窦道,并联合个体化的皮瓣封闭创面,以获得良好的修复效果。.

Publication types

  • Observational Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Buttocks* / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Muscle, Skeletal / surgery
  • Paranasal Sinus Diseases / complications
  • Perforator Flap / blood supply
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures* / methods
  • Pressure Ulcer* / surgery
  • Skin Transplantation
  • Soft Tissue Injuries / complications
  • Young Adult