Interpretation of the Visual Field in Neuro-ophthalmic Disorders

Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2024 Mar;24(3):67-81. doi: 10.1007/s11910-024-01332-3. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

Abstract

Purpose of review: In this review, we will describe current methods for visual field testing in neuro-ophthalmic clinical practice and research, develop terminology that accurately describes patterns of field deficits, and discuss recent advances such as augmented or virtual reality-based perimetry and the use of artificial intelligence in visual field interpretation.

Recent findings: New testing strategies that reduce testing times, improve patient comfort, and increase sensitivity for detecting small central or paracentral scotomas have been developed for static automated perimetry. Various forms of machine learning-based tools such as archetypal analysis are being tested to quantitatively depict and monitor visual field abnormalities in optic neuropathies. Studies show that the combined use of optical coherence tomography and standard automated perimetry to determine the structure-function relationship improves clinical care in neuro-ophthalmic disorders. Visual field assessment must be performed in all patients with neuro-ophthalmic disorders affecting the afferent visual pathway. Quantitative visual field analysis using standard automated perimetry is critical in initial diagnosis, monitoring disease progression, and guidance of therapeutic plans. Visual field defects can adversely impact activities of daily living such as reading, navigation, and driving and thus impact quality of life. Visual field testing can direct appropriate occupational low vision rehabilitation in affected individuals.

Keywords: Archetypal analysis; Kinetic perimetry; Neuro-ophthalmology; Static automated perimetry; Visual field.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Humans
  • Optic Nerve Diseases* / diagnosis
  • Quality of Life
  • Visual Field Tests / methods
  • Visual Fields*