Engaging with nature and work: associations among the built and natural environment, experiences outside, and job engagement and creativity

Rebecca M Brossoit; Tori L Crain; Jordyn J Leslie; Gwenith G Fisher; Aaron M Eakman

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1268962

Engaging with nature and work: associations among the built and natural environment, experiences outside, and job engagement and creativity

Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 11:14:1268962. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1268962. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Rebecca M Brossoit^{1

2}, Tori L Crain³, Jordyn J Leslie³, Gwenith G Fisher^{1

4}, Aaron M Eakman⁵

Affiliations

¹ Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
² Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.
³ Department of Psychology, Portland State University, Portland, OR, United States.
⁴ Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, United States.
⁵ Department of Occupational Therapy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.

Abstract

Introduction: There is substantial evidence that contact with nature is related to positive health and well-being outcomes, but extensions of this research to work-related outcomes is sparse. Some organizations are redesigning workspaces to incorporate nature and adopting nature-related policies, warranting a need for empirical studies that test the influence of nature on employee outcomes.

Methods: The present mixed-methods study tests and extends the biophilic work design model to examine associations among the built and natural environment at work and home, experiences of time spent outside (i.e., amount of time outside, enjoyment of time outside, outdoor activities), and motivational work outcomes (i.e., job engagement and creativity). Objective geographic data were combined with quantitative and qualitative survey responses from working adults (N = 803).

Results: Our results broadly indicate that individuals who work and live in areas with greater natural amenities (i.e., access to water, topographic variation, temperate climates) spend more time outside and enjoy time outside to a greater degree, and these experiences are in turn associated with greater engagement and creativity at work. We did not find evidence that the surrounding built environment (i.e., urbanity) at work or home was associated with outdoor experiences or work-related outcomes. Additionally, six categories of outdoor activities were identified in the qualitative analyses - leisure activities, relaxation, physical activities, social interactions, tasks and errands, and travel.

Discussion: The findings from this study provide evidence that the natural environment, particularly at home, can benefit work-related outcomes via greater time and enjoyment of time outside. This study has implications for employee time use and organizational effectiveness.

Keywords: built environment; creativity; job engagement; natural environment; outdoor activities; outdoor experience.

Abstract

Grants and funding