Leveraging external control data in the design and analysis of neuro-oncology trials: Pearls and perils

Neuro Oncol. 2024 May 3;26(5):796-810. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae005.

Abstract

Background: Randomized controlled trials have been the gold standard for evaluating medical treatments for many decades but they are often criticized for requiring large sample sizes. Given the urgent need for better therapies for glioblastoma, it has been argued that data collected from patients treated with the standard regimen can provide high-quality external control data to supplement or replace concurrent control arm in future glioblastoma trials.

Methods: In this article, we provide an in-depth appraisal of the use of external control data in the context of neuro-oncology trials. We describe several clinical trial designs with particular attention to how external information is utilized and address common fallacies that may lead to inappropriate adoptions of external control data.

Results: Using 2 completed glioblastoma trials, we illustrate the use of an assessment tool that lays out a blueprint for assembling a high-quality external control data set. Using statistical simulations, we draw caution from scenarios where these approaches can fall short on controlling the type I error rate.

Conclusions: While this approach may hold promise in generating informative data in certain settings, this sense of optimism should be tampered with a healthy dose of skepticism due to a myriad of design and analysis challenges articulated in this review. Importantly, careful planning is key to its successful implementation.

Keywords: biases; concurrent control; external control; glioblastoma; type I error.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Brain Neoplasms* / therapy
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / standards
  • Glioblastoma* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / methods
  • Research Design* / standards