γδ T cells respond directly and selectively to the skin commensal yeast Malassezia for IL-17-dependent fungal control

PLoS Pathog. 2024 Jan 12;20(1):e1011668. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011668. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Stable microbial colonization of the skin depends on tight control by the host immune system. The lipid-dependent yeast Malassezia typically colonizes skin as a harmless commensal and is subject to host type 17 immunosurveillance, but this fungus has also been associated with diverse skin pathologies in both humans and animals. Using a murine model of Malassezia exposure, we show that Vγ4+ dermal γδ T cells expand rapidly and are the major source of IL-17A mediating fungal control in colonized skin. A pool of memory-like Malassezia-responsive Vγ4+ T cells persisted in the skin, were enriched in draining lymph nodes even after fungal clearance, and were protective upon fungal re-exposure up to several weeks later. Induction of γδT17 immunity depended on IL-23 and IL-1 family cytokine signalling, whereas Toll-like and C-type lectin receptors were dispensable. Furthermore, Vγ4+ T cells from Malassezia-exposed hosts were able to respond directly and selectively to Malassezia-derived ligands, independently of antigen-presenting host cells. The fungal moieties detected were shared across diverse species of the Malassezia genus, but not conserved in other Basidiomycota or Ascomycota. These data provide novel mechanistic insight into the induction and maintenance of type 17 immunosurveillance of skin commensal colonization that has significant implications for cutaneous health.

MeSH terms

  • Allergens
  • Animals
  • Humans
  • Interleukin-17
  • Malassezia*
  • Mice
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae
  • T-Lymphocytes

Substances

  • Interleukin-17
  • Allergens

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant # 310030_189255 to SLL), a Career Development Award from The Medical Research Council (MR/R008302/1 to NEM), and project grant funding from Bart’s and The London Charity (MGU0465 to NEM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.