In Vitro Assessment of Compression Patterns Using Different Methods to Achieve Interfragmentary Compression during Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2024 May;37(3):130-137. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1778132. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate and characterize different methods to achieve interfragmentary compression during tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO).

Study design: TPLO was performed in 20 canine tibia models (Sawbones, Vashon, Washington, United States) using 3D-printed guides for standardization. Interfragmentary compression was assessed using pressure-sensitive films (Prescale, Fujifilm, Atherstone, United Kingdom). Seven compression methods were tested: (1) Kern bone holding forceps clamping the craniodistal aspect of the TPLO plate to the caudal aspect of the tibia (K); (2) using the distal TPLO plate dynamic compression hole (P); (3) pointed bone reduction forceps engaging the caudal aspect of the proximal bone fragment and the cranial aspect of the tibial crest (F); (4) K + P; (5) K + F; (6) F + P; and (7) K + F + P. Five measurements were obtained for each method, and each bone model was used for two measurements (single method, ± plate). The interfragmentary surface was digitalized and divided into quadrants for standardization and pixel density calculation: Q1, craniomedial; Q2, craniolateral; Q3, caudomedial; and Q4, caudolateral. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Mean pressures per quadrant differed significantly between methods (p < 0.001). Methods K, F, and P produced more craniomedial, craniolateral, and caudal compression, respectively. Method K resulted in loss of caudal compression (p < 0.001). Method F + P provided the most even distribution of high interfragmentary compression forces. The addition of method K to this construct (K + F + P) marginally increased cranial compression (p = 0.189 for Q1; p < 0.001 for Q2), but reduced compression caudally (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Method F + P provided more even interfragmentary compression. If method K were used, then combined use with method F + P would be recommended.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Dogs / surgery
  • Osteotomy* / methods
  • Osteotomy* / veterinary
  • Stifle / surgery
  • Tibia* / surgery