Incremental versus conventional haemodialysis in end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kullaya Takkavatakarn; Kavita Jintanapramote; Jeerath Phannajit; Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa; Somchai Eiam-Ong; Paweena Susantitaphong

doi:10.1093/ckj/sfad280

Incremental versus conventional haemodialysis in end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clin Kidney J. 2023 Nov 8;17(1):sfad280. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad280. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Authors

Kullaya Takkavatakarn¹, Kavita Jintanapramote², Jeerath Phannajit^{1

3}, Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa¹, Somchai Eiam-Ong¹, Paweena Susantitaphong^{1

3}

Affiliations

¹ Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
² Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Royal Thai Air Force, Bangkok, Thailand.
³ Research Unit for Metabolic Bone Disease in CKD patients, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Abstract

Background: Appropriate dialysis prescription in the transitional setting from chronic kidney disease to end-stage kidney disease is still challenging. Conventional thrice-weekly haemodialysis (HD) might be associated with rapid loss of residual kidney function (RKF) and high mortality. The benefits and risks of incremental HD compared with conventional HD were explored in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2023 for studies that compared the impacts of incremental (once- or twice-weekly HD) and conventional thrice-weekly HD on cardiovascular events, RKF, vascular access complications, quality of life, hospitalization and mortality.

Results: A total of 36 articles (138 939 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The mortality rate and cardiovascular events were similar between incremental and conventional HD {odds ratio [OR] 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.72-1.04 and OR 0.67 [95% CI 0.43-1.05], respectively}. However, hospitalization and loss of RKF were significantly lower in patients treated with incremental HD [OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.27-0.72) and OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.25-0.39), respectively]. In a sensitivity analysis that included studies restricted to those with RKF or urine output criteria, incremental HD had significantly lower cardiovascular events [OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.08-0.63)] and mortality [OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.37-0.79)]. Vascular access complications, hyperkalaemia and volume overload were not statistically different between groups.

Conclusions: Incremental HD has been shown to be safe and may provide superior benefits in clinical outcomes, particularly in appropriately selected patients. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these potential advantages.

Keywords: conventional haemodialysis; incremental haemodialysis; once-weekly haemodialysis; residual kidney function; twice-weekly haemodialysis.