Clinicians face a global challenge treating infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae because of the high rate of antibiotic resistance. This cross-sectional study from the Nepal Armed Police Force Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, characterized resistance patterns in Enterobacteriaceae across different antimicrobial classes and assessed incidences of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) infections. Enterobacteriaceae from clinical samples were isolated on blood and MacConkey agar, except for urine samples on cysteine lactose electrolyte-deficient agar. To determine antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, including MDR and XDR, the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was used. Statistics were performed using SPSS, v. 17.0. Members of the family were identified in 14.5% (95% CI: 16.2-12.8%) of the total samples (N = 1,617), primarily in urine (54.7%, 128/234), blood (19.7%, 46/234), and sputum (15.0%, 35/234). Escherichia coli (n = 118, 44.2%) was the most predominant bacteria, followed by Citrobacter freundii (n = 81, 30.3%). As much as 95.6% (392/410) of the isolates were penicillin-resistant, whereas only 36.2% (290/801) were carbapenem-resistant. A total of 96 (36.0%) MDR and 98 (36.7%) XDR Enterobacteriaceae were identified. Proteus mirabilis (44.4%, 8/18) predominated MDR cultures, whereas C. freundii (53.1%, 43/81) predominated XDR cultures. Multidrug resistant (38.4%, 71/154) and XDR Enterobacteriaceae (22.7%, 35/154) were chiefly uropathogens. Fluoroquinolone resistance rates in non-MDR, MDR, and XDR isolates were 19.9%, 63.2%, and 96.2%, respectively, whereas cephalosporin resistance rates were 28.6%, 72.9%, and 95.4% and penicillin resistance rates were 67.0%, 97.4%, and 98.0%. One-seventh of patients visiting the hospital were found to be infected with Enterobacteriaceae, and of these patients, at least one-fourth were infected with MDR strains.