Handheld ultrasound-assisted versus palpation-guided combined spinal-epidural for labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial

Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):23009. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50407-7.

Abstract

Preprocedural ultrasound assistance can enhance the efficacy of neuraxial anesthesia in obstetrics. We investigated whether the use of handheld ultrasound can shorten the procedural time of labor combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia compared with conventional landmark-guided methods. Eighty-four women requesting labor analgesia were randomly assigned to either handheld ultrasound-assisted or palpation-guided CSE analgesia. Primary outcome was procedure time of the CSE analgesia. Secondary outcomes included identification time, performance time, number of needle manipulations required for epidural/spinal success, first-attempt success rate, periprocedural pain scores, the incidence of accidental dural puncture, and patient satisfaction. Total procedure time did not significantly differ between the ultrasound and palpation groups (median [IQR], 191.5 [167-224] vs. 204.5 [163-358] s; P = 0.442). However, the performance time was significantly shorter in the ultrasound group (134.5 [115-177] vs. 183 [129-296] s; P = 0.011), although identification time was longer in the ultrasound group (53 [41-72] vs. 30.5 [21-45] s; P < 0.001). The epidural success rate at first insertion attempt was higher in the ultrasound group (85.7% vs. 59.5%, P = 0.014). Preprocedural handheld ultrasound assistance resulted in equivalent total procedure times but reduced performance times and higher first-attempt success rates. Therefore, clinicians may consider this technique for labor CSE analgesia.Trial registration: NCT04759547.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Analgesia, Epidural* / methods
  • Anesthesia, Spinal* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Palpation
  • Pregnancy
  • Spinal Puncture
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional / methods

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04759547