Identification of Additives in Disposable Face Masks and Evaluation of Their Toxicity Using Marine Medaka (Oryzias melastigma)

Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Jan 9;58(1):121-131. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c06216. Epub 2023 Dec 20.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in huge amounts of face masks worldwide. However, there is a lack of awareness on the additives and their potential risk to aquatic ecosystems of face masks. To address this issue, the additives and their toxicity in 13 face masks (e.g., polypropylene, polyethylene, and polylactic acid) were determined using nontarget analysis and bioassays. A total of 826 organic additives including intermediates (14.8%), surfactants (9.3%), plasticizers (8.2%), and antioxidants (6.1%) were tentatively identified, with 213 compounds being assigned confidence levels of 1 and 2. Interestingly, polylactic acid masks contained more additives than most polypropylene or polyethylene masks. Among these additives, the concentration of tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate in masks was 9.4-978.2 ng/g with a 100% detection frequency. Furthermore, 13 metals such as zinc (up to 202.0 μg/g), copper (32.5 μg/g), and chromium (up to 5.7 μg/g) were detected in the face masks. The methanol extracts of the masks showed the developmental toxicity, swimming behavior, and/or endocrine disruption in embryos/larvae of Oryzias melastigma. The findings demonstrate that face masks contain various toxic additives to marine medaka, which deserves close attention to pollution by face masks.

Keywords: developmental toxicity; estrogenic activity; locomotor behavior; metals; molecular networking; nontarget analysis; organic additives.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Ecosystem
  • Humans
  • Masks
  • Oryzias*
  • Pandemics
  • Polyethylenes
  • Polypropylenes
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical*

Substances

  • Polypropylenes
  • Polyethylenes
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical