Deidentifying Narrative Assessments to Facilitate Data Sharing in Medical Education

Acad Med. 2024 May 1;99(5):513-517. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005596. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

Abstract

Problem: Narrative assessments are commonly incorporated into competency-based medical education programs. However, efforts to share competency-based medical education assessment data among programs to support the evaluation and improvement of assessment systems have been limited in part because of security concerns. Deidentifying assessment data mitigates these concerns, but deidentifying narrative assessments is time-consuming, resource intensive, and error prone. The authors developed and tested a tool to automate the deidentification of narrative assessments and facilitate their review.

Approach: The authors met throughout 2021 and 2022 to iteratively design, test, and refine the deidentification algorithm and data review interface. Preliminary testing of the prototype deidentification algorithm was performed using narrative assessments from the University of Saskatchewan emergency medicine program. The algorithm's accuracy was assessed by the authors using the review interface designed for this purpose. Formal testing included 2 rounds of deidentification and review by members of the authorship team. Both the algorithm and data review interface were refined during the testing process.

Outcomes: Authors from 3 institutions, including 3 emergency medicine programs, an anesthesia program, and a surgical program, participated in formal testing. In the final round of review, 99.4% of the narrative assessments were fully deidentified (names, nicknames, and pronouns removed). The results were comparable for each institution and specialty. The data review interface was improved with feedback obtained after each round of review and found to be intuitive.

Next steps: This innovation has demonstrated viability evidence of an algorithmic approach to the deidentification of assessment narratives while reinforcing that a small number of errors are likely to persist. Future steps include the refinement of both the algorithm to improve its accuracy and the data review interface to support additional data set formats.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms*
  • Clinical Competence / standards
  • Competency-Based Education / methods
  • Education, Medical / methods
  • Educational Measurement / methods
  • Emergency Medicine / education
  • Humans
  • Information Dissemination / methods
  • Narration
  • Saskatchewan