Comparative analysis of mitogenomes among three species of grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acridoidea: Gomphocerinae) and their phylogenetic implications

PeerJ. 2023 Dec 15:11:e16550. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16550. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Whole mitochondrial genomes have been widely used in phylogenetic analysis, population genetics and biogeography studies. This study sequenced and characterized three complete mitochondrial genomes (Dasyhippus peipingensis, Myrmeleotettix palpalis, Aeropedellus prominemarginis) and determined their phylogenetic position in Acrididae. The length of the mitochondrial genomes ranged from 15,621-15,629 bp and composed of 13 PCGs, 2 rRNA, 22 tRNA genes and an AT control region. The arrangement and structure of the mitochondrial genomes were similar to those of other invertebrates. Comparative genomics revealed that the three mitochondrial genomes were highly conserved in terms of gene size, structure, and codon usage, all PCGs were purified selections with an ATN start codon and a TAN stop codon. All tRNAs could be folded into the typical clover-leaf structure, except tRNA Ser (AGN) that lacked a dihydrouridine (DHU) arm. Phylogenetic analysis based on 13 PCGs of 34 Acrididae species and seven outgroup species revealed that differences in the shape of antennae within the family Acrididae should be given less weight as a taxonomic character for higher-level classification. Moreover, the divergence time estimates indicates that in Gomphocerinae, the species with clubbed antennae were formed within the nearest 18 Mya, and Pacris xizangensis is more ancient.

Keywords: Gomphocerinae; Grasshopper; Mitogenome; Phylogenetics.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Genome, Insect
  • Genome, Mitochondrial* / genetics
  • Grasshoppers* / genetics
  • Phylogeny
  • RNA, Transfer / genetics

Substances

  • RNA, Transfer

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 32070473 and 31872274) and the Hebei Provincial Innovation Capacity Enhancement Program Special Project for High-level Talent Team Building (No. 225A2904D). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.