Bendamustine impairs humoral but not cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in rituximab-treated B-cell lymphoma-affected patients

Front Immunol. 2023 Dec 1:14:1322594. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1322594. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Background: Patients with B-cell lymphoma are a fragile category of subjects, particularly exposed to infections and characterized by an impaired vaccination response due to the disease itself and, even more, to the chemotherapy regimen. For this reason, extensive knowledge of the immune response status of these subjects is of fundamental importance to obtain possible indications for a tailored immunization strategy.

Methods: We enrolled two cohorts of patients with B-cell lymphoma under rituximab treatment or 3-24 months after treatment. In all patients, we evaluated both humoral and cellular immunological memory toward SARS-CoV-2, after standard vaccination and upon one booster dose.

Results: We observed no Spike-specific IgG production in patients (n = 25) under anti-CD20 treatment, whereas patients (n = 16) vaccinated after the completion of chemotherapy showed a higher humoral response. Evaluating SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response, we found that patients in both cohorts had developed robust cellular immunity after vaccination. Of the 21 patients (51%) that experienced a breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection, only six patients developed severe disease. Interestingly, these six patients had all been treated with rituximab plus bendamustine. Notably, we observed that Spike-specific IgG levels in patients treated with rituximab plus bendamustine were absent or lower compared with those in patients treated with rituximab plus other chemotherapy, whereas Spike-specific T-cell response was not different based on chemotherapy regiment.

Discussion: Our results show that, in patients with B-cell lymphoma under rituximab therapy, anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces a weak or absent humoral response but a consistent T-cell response. In addition, chemotherapy regimens with bendamustine further reduce patients' ability to mount a Spike-specific humoral response even after a long time period from chemotherapy discontinuation. These results provide evidence that different chemotherapeutics display different immunosuppressive properties that could be taken in to account in the choice of the right drug regimen for the right patient. Moreover, they question whether immunocompromised patients, particularly those treated with bendamustine, need interventions to improve vaccine-induced immune response.

Keywords: B cell lymphoma; SARS-CoV-2; T cell response; anti-CD20mAb; bendamustine; humoral response; mRNA vaccine; rituximab.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bendamustine Hydrochloride / therapeutic use
  • COVID-19 Vaccines
  • COVID-19* / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Immunity, Cellular
  • Immunoglobulin G
  • Lymphoma, B-Cell* / drug therapy
  • Rituximab / therapeutic use
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Vaccination

Substances

  • Rituximab
  • Bendamustine Hydrochloride
  • COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Immunoglobulin G

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the University of Florence, project RICTD2122, by Tuscany Region (TagSARS CoV 2), by Ministry of Health project RF-2021-12374177 and GR-2021-12372615.