Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Evaluation of the Accuracy of Implant Surgery with Conventional (Free Hand) Implant Placement vs Computer Fabricated 3D Guide Implant Placement

Nitin Verma; Gurpreet Kamboj; Jeevan Lata; Pradeep Singh; Sharad Gowda

doi:10.1007/s12663-023-01887-7

Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Evaluation of the Accuracy of Implant Surgery with Conventional (Free Hand) Implant Placement vs Computer Fabricated 3D Guide Implant Placement

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Dec;22(4):1115-1122. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01887-7. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

Authors

Nitin Verma¹, Gurpreet Kamboj¹, Jeevan Lata¹, Pradeep Singh¹, Sharad Gowda¹

Affiliation

¹ Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Punjab Government Dental College and Hospital, Amritsar, India.

PMID: 38105824
PMCID: PMC10719224 (available on 2024-12-01)
DOI: 10.1007/s12663-023-01887-7

Abstract

Introduction: Dental implants have been used in a variety of conventional technique-based forms for many years which had its own drawbacks. With the advent of cone beam CT, proper surgical and prosthetic planning is possible now a days. To achieve ideal implant placement, good prosthetic fabrication and overall successful prognosis computer fabricated guide aided surgery have been developed.

Aim and objective: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the accuracy of implant placement in partially edentulous patients with conventional free hand technique and computer fabricated guide of implant placement by comparing pre- and post-CBCT data.

Methods: The present split mouth study design was conducted with forty sample size on twenty randomly selected patients who were treated with bilateral partially edentulous sites requiring dental implants. Patients were treated with both conventional (free hand) technique and computer fabricated 3D guide aided technique of implant placement. Comparison of accuracy of implant placement was done by comparing the pre- and postoperative CBCT data in terms of mean coronal deviation, mean apical deviation and mean angular deviation.

Results and conclusion: The results showed that there is no statistically significant difference between mean coronal deviation, mean apical deviation and mean angular deviation of planned and placed implants in both conventional technique (free hand technique) and computer fabricated 3D guide aided implant placement technique. Hence, this study concluded that conventional technique of implant placement is equally efficient in comparison with computer fabricated guide aided surgery in terms of accuracy of implant placement.

Keywords: CBCT; Dental implant; Partial edentulism; Surgical guide.

© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.